VimIy微民网,让世界倾听微民的声音! 设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 网站地图
当前位置:主页 > 大杂烩 >

【谁是最受伤的】红米NOTE直接把MTK真8核拉低到千元价位,对比三星伪八核机的售价,联发科会怎么想

整理时间:2014-03-29 06:11 热度:°C

【楼主】2014-03-27 15:17

» 红米NOTE直接把MTK真8核拉低到千元价位,对比三星伪八核机的售价,联发科会怎么想
    机海论智,荧屏竞大,价安为王,核芯必八!
    
     原本定位¥1500~2000中阶手机的真八核MT6592,在厂商的狂操下,瞬入杀戮红海。
    
     ¥799 - 红米Note/TD+G/MT6592m@1.4GHz/5.5”@720p/1GB RAM/8GB ROM/R13MP/F5MP/3200mAh
     ¥999 - 红米Note/TD+G/MT6592@1.7GHz/5.5”@720p/2GB RAM/8GB ROM/R13MP/F5MP/3200mAh
     ¥888 - 酷派大神F1/W+G/MT6592@GHz/5.0”@720p/2GB RAM/8GB ROM/R13MP/F5MP/2500mAh
     ¥798 - 荣耀3C/TD+G/MT6582@1.3GHz/5.0”@720p/1GB RAM/GB ROM/R8MP@f2.0/F5MP@f2.4/2300mAh
     ¥998 - 荣耀3X畅玩版/TD+G/MT6592m@1.4GHz/5.5”@720p/2GB RAM/8GB ROM/R13MP@/F5MP/3000mAh
     ¥788 - 联想黄金斗士S8/TD+G/MT6592m@1.4GHz/5.3”@720p/1GB RAM/8GB ROM/R13MP/F5MP/3000mAh
     ¥988 - 联想黄金斗士S8/TD+G/MT6592m@1.4GHz/5.3”@720p/2GB RAM/16GB ROM/R13MP/F5MP/3000mAh
     ¥998 - nibiru H1/TD+G/MT6592@1.7GHz/5.0”@1080p/2GB RAM/16GB ROM/ R13MP/F5MP/2000mAh
    
     ¥799已是大屏真八核的标竿价位,红米再度引爆高配低价鏖战。逐鹿中原者,岂甘寂寞?
    
    
    
    
    
     MTK'真八核'平台刚推出时的定位是在中端千元以上手机市场跟高通抗衡。酷派大神F1首祭出888元超低价,打乱了 MTK的市场布局,MTK曾一度决定断货酷派三个月。然中国4G商用后,电信三大腕的'推进4G千元机的普及,主推五模十频'终端策略独尊4G,势让高通 一家独大,迫使MTK顺水推舟,玩得更大。
     - 手机中国联盟
    
     MTK推八核入火坑的壮举,虽在稳住阵脚,不但尽显在LTE产品上的窘态,同时让利八核来成就一众杀红眼的手机OEM,也必然在其芯片获利跟其上游供应链上形成不小压力,28nm的投片将更加审慎。
    
     而同样事关4G,ZTE的4G基频WisFone 7510已通过中移动认证,成为中国第一家合格的国产LTE芯片,虽与高通、美满、博通的整合SoC尚有距离,但进度上已超前MTK半年。估计海思下个季度可追随ZTE脚步。
    
    
    
    MTK效应说明了何以空头引三大隐忧唱衰高通。
    
     Three-fold threat to Qualcomm in the China marke:
     1.Taiwan’s MediaTek and other lower-cost providers could derail Qualcomm’s sales.
     对手低价芯片将阻碍高通在华销售。
     2.China could bring down Qualcomm’s average selling price.
     中国低价手机大行其道,将拉低高通产品售价。
     3.China’s regulators could impose harsh requirements on Qualcomm.
     中国监管单位可能对高通施加严苛要求。
    
     然多头Bernstein明显非常不以为然。
    
     Most competitors for the China market are well behind Qualcomm on integration, geometry, and radio technology, and Qualcomm holds the majority of sockets currently certified for use on China Mobile’s forthcoming LTE network. Of the primary competitive candidates, MediaTek is likely the most viable (and fierce) competitor, and understands well how to do business in China. However, Qualcomm’s challenges on 3G have been, in our opinion, more on marketing to the Chinese consumer than anything else. And, it appears Qualcomm is now getting much more responsive to the demands of Chinese market. Despite previously deriding octa-core chips as a marketing gimmick, Qualcomm is fully embracing the multi-core trends, announcing its own octa-core chip, the Snapdragon 615 (or MSM8939) at the MWC. The chip clearly is aimed to counter MediaTek’s success in the octa-core segment, and is targeted at the mid range. Similarly, in another marketing effort Qualcomm is targeting their first 64 bit chip (the Snapdragon 410 MSM8916) designed specifically for the needs of the lower-end China market, delivering high performance into lower end segments at attractive price points.
    
     Fears of ASP decline have been part and parcel with Qualcomm ever since the “Great ASP Debacle” of 2010. However, mix to emerging markets is not new; QCOM’s QTL unit growth has been driven by this shift for years. ASPs have increased markedly since that time, even as emerging market growth has substantially outpaced unit growth in developed markets, more than offsetting negative mix as the smartphone cycle continued apace.
    
     As the 4G market, over the next few years, potentially transitions here we would love to see QCOM put a framework in place to capture payments; even if at a lower rate we believe they would still be substantially accretive as this large “shadow volume” of 3G moves over into royalty-bearing mode. We estimate substantial accretive contribution from China Mobile LTE to Qualcomm’s royalties as a result, even if it comes at a lower rate. The push toward 5-mode chipsets may help with this Additionally, it appears that Qualcomm is upping their engagement with China. We note recent news that Qualcomm is engaging with SMIC for 28nm products. While Qualcomm has indicated they will be upping their foundry multi-sourcing efforts, we were somewhat surprised to see SMIC mentioned at least in the guise of 28nm, and SMICs inferior capabilities vs. TSMC or Samsung all suggest limited benefits to QCOM from a strict multi-sourcing perspective (benefits on pricing, flex capacity, etc). Benefits to Qualcomm from assuaging China, however, could in theory be much more substantial, and the timing of the newsflow (in the middle of the investigation) suggests other motives may indeed be at play.
     - Stacy Rasgon of Bernstein Research
    
     敦亲睦邻,Qualcomm向SMIC抛媚眼?
    
网友评论2014-03-27 16:27


    联发科真是良心企业。。当年可是铸就了一大批山寨厂
    
    现在只是山寨厂变正规了或者正规厂变山寨了。。。。
    

    
    
    

上一篇:绝对好停车。
下一篇:没有了
关于网站 | 网站声明 | 用户反馈 | 合作伙伴 | 联系我们
Copyright 2012年2月8日 苏ICP备12030052号-3