» 诺贝尔经济学奖得主保罗克鲁格曼：中国的发展将是一项了不起的人类成就，它将害死我们所有人Paul Krugman considers China a mortal threat in one key respect: climate change.在气候变化这个关键方面，保罗克鲁格曼将中国视为是致命威胁。"If you worry about climate change and stuff like that, then China is -- Chinese growth is a wonderful human success story that could kill us all," the Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist said at the New York Times DealBook conference on Wednesday.“如果你担心气候变化以及类似的课题，那么中国就是——中国的发展就是项了不起的人类成就故事，它将害死我们所有人。”这位诺贝尔经济学奖得主兼纽约时报专栏作家在纽约时报周三举行的DealBook会议上如此表示。He also noted, "To some extent actually, we are hurt by Chinese growth. ... There are scarce natural resources, and we are in fact competing for limited supplies of oil, minerals, etc."他同时提出，“事实上就某些方面而言，我们被中国的发展所伤害，...自然资源缺乏，我们事实上在争夺石油跟矿产等资源。”But instead of being confrontational, the U.S. needs to give China more of a voice in trade policy, Krugman said. "You can't deny them a position that corresponds with their size."但与其跟中国进行对抗，克鲁格曼认为在贸易政策上美国反而应该跟中国展开更广泛的对话。“你没法拒绝承认中国有权取得符合自己规模的经济地位。”The alternative, he suggested, is much less appealing. "Even if we conclude that Chinese growth hurts us, what are we going to do? Bomb them?" he asked. "Going out for all-out protectionism is probably not going to be to our benefit."他认为两个只能活一个的零和游戏不是解决问题之道。“即使我们断定中国的发展伤害了我们，我们又能怎么样？轰炸他们吗？”他问道，“全面抵制中国的保护主义很可能不符合我们的利益。”China -- which plans to flatten 700 mountains for development, according to China Daily -- is the largest polluter in the world, and most of its electricity comes from coal, the Associated Press reports. But the average American still has a much larger carbon footprint than the average Chinese person, according to a July report by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. A significant percentage of China's greenhouse gas emissions are produced by its export industries.据中国日报报道，为了发展，中国计划推平700座山——美联社报道指出，中国是世界上最大的污染源，他的绝大部分电力来自烧煤发电。不过荷兰环境评估研究所6月推出的报告认为美国的人均二氧化碳排放量还是远远超过中国人均指数。中国温室气体排放的一个重要部分来自于出口加工业。Because the country was considered a developing economy when the Kyoto Protocol was written in the 1990s, China is not obligated to cut greenhouse gas emissions under the treaty. The U.S. has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol.在1990年代京都议定书草拟时中国被视为发展中国家，因此根据协定不需要承担缩减温室气体排放的责任。美国尚未批准京都议定书。呵呵 中国也只是“将”印第安人跟黑人是已经被你们欧美佬害死多少了？杨大爷这满满的优越感啊对于玩死他们我已经有点迫不及待了叫美国人均少点不就行了说到底还是自恃老大，要别人为他让步比资源消耗？中国比得上欧美发达国家？说道浪费，欧美的浪费甩我们几条街说的好像他们的汽车不烧油一样的。我们污染严重还不是他们要产业转移？看见某些人这么不开心，我们就更应该开心了。前主子大英帝国就没有什么想说的？意思中国不用这些资源他们也不用了 你么这近代污染还少了么诺奖得主：中国的发展将是一项了不起的人类成就，它将害死我们所有人看见某些人这么不开心，我们就更应该开心了。中国后面还有三哥为了保证我有肉吃 其他人都必须饿死？草泥马 敢情连大家都少吃点都不行～看他们还能蹦跶多久克鲁格曼是一直唱衰中国的，当被中国的发展打脸后就转向声称中国的发展不可持续很快就会终结。