VimIy微民网,让世界倾听微民的声音! 设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 网站地图
当前位置:主页 > 购物街 >

PNAS新文研究结果, 用期望寿命为冬季供暖买单

整理时间:2013-07-08 21:20 来源:www.vimiy.com 作者:编辑 点击:

【楼主】2013-07-09 09:24

» PNAS新文研究结果, 用期望寿命为冬季供暖买单
    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/07/03/1300018110
    淮河南北期望寿命差5.5年。PNAS发表的最新研究表明,因为淮河南北供暖政策的不同,导致过去20年间,淮河以北居民期望寿命比淮河以南短大概5.5年。而其根本原因是煤炭燃烧导致的空气悬浮颗粒多少不同所致。如何平衡发展经济、环境保护和公共健康之间的关系真是迫在眉睫的任务了。
    
    供暖会加重空气污染导致期望寿命降低,但是不供暖的话寒冷会导致多少期望寿命降低就没法弄到数据了
    
    This paper's findings suggest that an arbitrary Chinese policy that greatly increases total suspended particulates (TSPs) air pollution is causing the 500 million residents of Northern China to lose more than 2.5 billion life years of life expectancy. The quasi-experimental empirical approach is based on China’s Huai River policy, which provided free winter heating via the provision of coal for boilers in cities north of the Huai River but denied heat to the south. Using a regression discontinuity design based on distance from the Huai River, we find that ambient concentrations of TSPs are about 184 μg/m3 or 55% higher in the north. Further, the results indicate that life expectancies are about 5.5 y (95% CI: 0.8, 10.2) lower in the north owing to an increased incidence of cardiorespiratory mortality. More generally, the analysis suggests that long-term exposure to an additional 100 μg/m3 of TSPs is associated with a reduction in life expectancy at birth of about 3.0 y (95% CI: 0.4, 5.6).
    


网友评论2013-07-09 09:26


    美国科学院院报真是啥玩意儿都写。。。
    
    难怪影响因子上不去
    
网友评论2013-07-09 09:30


    貌似国外很多地方烧壁炉吧,那玩意污染也不小。
    
网友评论2013-07-09 09:31


    为何不食肉糜
    
网友评论2013-07-09 09:34


    为什么不说这寿命差是由于一个能吃橘子,一个只好吃枳呢?
    

    
    
    

关于网站 | 网站声明 | 用户反馈 | 合作伙伴 | 联系我们
Copyright © 2012年2月8日