» 拒绝世界最大贸易国的地位
    中国新近获得了一项政府不想要的地位：世界最大的贸易国。
    译文来源:
    原文地址：http://www.ltaaa.com/bbs/thread-142127-1-1.html
    原创翻译：龙腾网 www.ltaaa.com 翻译：灌水劳模 转载请注明出处
    正文翻译:
    BEIJING (AP) — Chinahas a new status its government doesn't want — world's biggest trader.
    Official Chinese and American trade data indicate China passed the United Stateslast year in total imports and exportsby a margin of $3.866 trillion to $3.822 trillion. That is about $44 billion,or just over 1 percent of China'stotal.
    The Commerce Ministryhas taken the unusual step of publicly denying China is the new No. 1. It says China still trailed the U.S. by $15.6billion last year — or a razor-thin 0.3 percent — under World TradeOrganization standards for valuing goods.
    
    中国新近获得了一项政府不想要的地位：世界最大的贸易国。
    中美官方贸易数据说明，去年中国进出口总额超过了美国，其中中国是3.866万亿美元、美国是3.822万亿美元。差距是440亿美元，略多于中国进出口总额的1%。
    中国商务部采取不同寻常的措施，公开否认中国是新的世界第一。商务部宣称：按照世贸组织的商品衡量标准，中国去年的进出口总额仍然比美国低156亿美元，差距仅占进出口总额的0.3%。
    
    Beijing wants to be a global leader but insists it still is a poor country.It is wary of any change that might erode that status and fuel demands foraction to stimulate the global economy or concessions on trade and climatechange.
    
    北京希望成为一个世界领导者，但仍坚持她是一个穷国。对于(穷国)地位的改变，北京很谨慎，因为这可能导致(国际社会)要求：刺激全球经济、在贸易及气候变化方面做出让步等。
    
    "I think there is some concern from the Ministry ofCommerce that this might be used as evidence by Western countries that China isnot doing its part to rebalance the global economy," said Xianfang Ren,China analyst for IHS Global Insight.
    
    环球透视公司的中国分析员Xianfang Ren说“我认为，商务部担心该事实被西方国家用作证据，来指责中国未做好全球经济再平衡方面中国所需承担的工作”。
    
    China's explosive trade growth has abruptly altered global business. Itcreated new opportunities for some but prompted complaints by the United Statesand others over its multibillion-dollar trade surpluses, market barriers andcurrency controls.
    
    中国爆炸式的贸易增长已经骤然的改变了全球商业。它为某些国家创造了新的机遇，但也引发了美国及其它国家的抱怨，包括：数十亿美元的贸易顺差、市场设障及汇率控制。
    
    In just five years, Chinahas surpassed the United Statesas a trading partner for much of the world, including American allies such as South Korea and Australia, according to anAssociated Press analysis of trade data.
    
    根据美联社一位贸易数据分析员所述，在短短五年内，中国已经超过美国成为很多国家的更为重要的贸易伙伴，其中包括美国的盟友诸如南韩和澳大利亚。
    
    As recently as 2006, the U.S.was the larger trading partner for 127 countries, versus just 70 for China.By 2011 the two had clearly traded places: 124 countries for China, 76 for the U.S.
    
    近如2006年，美国在127个国家的贸易份额领先于中国，与此相对应，中国仅在70个国家的贸易份额领先于美国。到了2011年，双方的位置已经发生明显的改变，中国在124个国家占优、美国在76个国家占优。
    
    Trade is especially sensitive amid anxiety over a possibleglobal slowdown. Beijing'strading partners accused it of hampering a recovery from the 2008 crisis byobstructing access to its market.
    
    在全球经济可能放缓的焦虑中，贸易格外引人注目。北京的贸易伙伴指责中国对自己的市场准入设置障碍，从而阻碍了这些国家从2008年的金融危机中复苏。
    
    For 2012, Beijingreported a $231 billion global trade surplus on exports of $2.049 trillion andimports of $1.818 trillion. The United States reported $1.547 trillion in exportsand $2.335 trillion in imports, for a deficit of $788 billion.
    
    据报道，2012年，中国出口2.049万亿美元、进口1.818万亿美元、整体贸易顺差2310亿美元；美国出口1.547万亿美元、进口2.335万亿美元、整体贸易逆差7880亿美元。
    The Commerce Ministry's statement last week said a WTOglobal trade report due out this month or in early March would recalculatethose figures and should show China still No. 2.
    
    上周(中国)商务部的声明说，应该在本月或三月上旬出炉的WTO全球贸易报告将重新计算这些(进出口)数据，那将会显示中国仍然是第二名。
    
    Also, some commentators have questioned whether China'strade data can be trusted because many companies are believed to misreportimports and exports to avoid taxes or get trade-related payments.
    
    同时，一些评论家已经质疑中国的贸易数据是否可靠，因为据信有很多公司谎报进出口数据以避税或获得贸易相关的转移支付。
    
    "Of course, it is only a matter of time before Chinabecomes No. 1," said Ren.
    
    环球透视公司的中国分析员Xianfang Ren说“当然，中国成为世界第一，只是时间问题”。
    
    Behind the headline numbers, Chinaand the United Statesare drastically different traders.
    
    隐藏在公布的数据之后(的事实是)，中国和美国是完全不同的贸易者。
    
    China is the world's low-cost factory, assembling most of its mobilephones, home appliances and other goods. But its factories need importedtechnology and components. Much of the value of its exports flows to U.S. and European technology suppliers and toproducers of components in Japan,Taiwan, South Korea and Southeast Asia.
    
    中国是世界的低成本工厂，组装手机、家用器具及其它商品。但是她的工厂需要进口技术及配件。她的出口产生的价值大部分流向美国及欧洲的技术提供者以及日本、台湾、南韩、东南亚的配件制造商。
    
    That has meant surpluses Asian countries used to run withthe United States wereshifted to China's column inU.S.national accounts.
    
    这意味着，在美国国家收支账目上，过去亚洲国家对美国的进出口被移入到了中国的名下。
    
    By contrast, the United States uses its owntechnology and adds more value to goods such as jetliners and factorymachinery. So it keeps a bigger share of the value of its exports.
    
    与此相比，美国使用其自有的技术，其商品具有更高的附加值，比如喷气飞机及工厂机械。所以美国保留了其出口产生的大部分价值。
    
    American workers also are far more productive. A tradegroup, the National Association of Manufacturers, says U.S. factories produce goods worth more than China'smanufacturing output with about one-tenth as many workers.
    
    而且，美国工人的生产率也高的多。一家贸易组织——国家制造业者联合会——说：美国工人的人均产出约为中国工人人均产出的10倍。
    
    Over the past decade, Chinapassed the United Statesas the biggest market for autos and mobile phones and became the biggestproducer of steel and ships. It overtook Japan in 2009 as the second-largesteconomy.
    
    在过去的10年内，中国超过美国成为最大的汽车及手机市场、最大的钢铁及船舶制造者。她在2009年超过日本成为第二大经济体。
    
    China also racked up firsts in more contentious areas as the biggestenergy consumer and producer of climate-changing greenhouse gases. Beijing initially deniedboth changes, possibly out of concern they would add pressure for environmentcontrols it feared might hamper economic growth.
    
    中国在一些有争议的领域也成为了世界第一，诸如最大的能源消费国、最大的温室气体排放国。北京最初否认上述两项变化，可能是因为他们担心这将增加环境控制方面的压力从而阻碍经济的增长。
    
    As a developing country, China was exempt from emissionslimits under the Kyoto Protocol aimed at curbing climate change. Some Westerncompanies complained that gave its manufacturers an unfair price advantage.
    
    作为发展中国家，中国被免除了《京都议定书》所设定的排放限制，该议定书的目标是抑制气候变化。一些西方公司抱怨说这给予了中国的制造商以不公平的价格优势。
    
    The huge volume of China's imports makes it a driverof growth for suppliers of goods from iron ore to computer chips, which isstarting to translate into political influence.
    
    中国巨大的进口量，使得其成为从铁矿石到计算机芯片等商品的提供国的增长驱动者，而这开始逐步转化为政治影响力。
    
    Even with growth slower than its double-digit rates of thepast decade, China'sshare of world output and trade is expected to keep rising. Annual growth isforecast at up to 8 percent over the next decade, far above U.S. and European levels.
    
    虽然目前的增速比过去十年那种两位数的增速要慢，中国占世界总产值及贸易的比例估计仍将持续上升。未来十年预计中国年增长率在8%以上，该增长率远远高于美国及欧洲的水平。
    
    Chinese leaders are trying to nurture more self-sustainingeconomic growth based on domestic consumption instead of exports. That mightslow demand growth for some raw materials, but China's appetite for other importscould pick up as consumer spending rises.
    
    中国领导人正在试图鼓励基于国内消费而不是出口的、更具有自我维持能力的经济增长。那将使得对一些原材料的需求增长放缓，不过，随着消费者的花费上升，中国对其它进口商品的胃口会跟上来。
    评论翻译:
    原创翻译：龙腾网 www.ltaaa.com 翻译：灌水劳模 转载请注明出处
    本帖论坛地址：http://www.ltaaa.com/bbs/thread-143405-1-1.html
    
    NightShift • 13 hrs agoReportAbuse
    American workers are more productivebecause they produce 10x as much product value as a Chinese worker? That soundsgood until you also consider that the average American worker is paid more than10x as much as the average Chinese.
    
    美国工人生产率更高是因为他们的人均产出是中国工人的十倍？听起来很棒，直到你注意到美国工人的工资比中国工人工资高十倍还不止。
    
    Stephen • 12 hrs agoReportAbuse
    the unions were the main key manyindustries moved to a cheaper place to produce. I know many people were wayoverly payed because the unions got a new contract. I have seen many peopleprotected by the unions going to work drunk, late, or just standing arounddoing nothing and the owner of the company could do nothing. I have alwaysfound out if you give a man a good days work he will give you a good days pay,just to keep you.Years ago unions were needed but no more
    
    工业被转移到劳动力更便宜的地区的主要原因是工会。我知道很多人的工资被给的过高了，只是因为工会获得了一个新的合同。由于工会的保护，我看到过很多人上班喝醉、迟到或者无所事事的晃荡，而公司老板却无可奈何。我通常也发现，如果你为某人好好的工作了一天，他也将好好的酬劳你，只是为了留住你。多年以前，工会是必要的，但是现在不再是了。
    
    Eric • 12 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Try ~25x for the pay for factory workers...salary + benefits ~ $8,500 per month in the US, vs. ~$325/month in China - forskilled labor
    You're generally still better off making stuff in the US, but the bean-countersonly see the hourly rates, and not the better productivity, generally betterquality, and other advantages of remaining onshore, like better control ofproprietary information...
    
    试试工人工资相差25倍，美国工人工资加福利每月8500美元，而中国熟练工月薪325美元。
    总体上在美国制造仍然是更好的选择，但是斤斤计较者只关注小时工资率，而不关注更高的生产率、更好的产品质量以及留在国内生产的其他好处，比如能更好的控制业主信息。
    
    John • 9 hrs agoReportAbuse
    NightShift, you're right, but you also haveto consider that our cost of living and taxation is greater than China'son average.
    
    层主，你是对的，但是你也需要考虑到，我们的生活成本及税费同样也比中国高的多。
    
    Alex • 9 hrs agoReportAbuse
    @stephen ahh youve hit the mark unions area doubled edged blade and it all comes down to greed. if there is no unioneventually the company will grind down the worker (lowest possible wage and nobenifits, walmart rings a bell). on the other hand a powerfull union will bleedthe company for concessions untill the profitability of the business iscompromised (carrier, gm, and new venture gear processing rings a bell).pasthistory proves company greed and recent history proves union greed. i witnessedthe later kind first hand at new venture gear, there were men there pushingbrooms for 40 dollars an hour. this was not sustainable the company made thisknown and then offered a union vote the company stays and workers accept wagecuts ( not to unlivable levels just down from 40 dollars an hour )or thecompany would move to china.
    The union voted unanimously to ship awaythere own jobs. and get this the workers laid off from this collected fatunemployment benfits to the very end because of the clause were you dont haveto take a job for less wages then you were making. tell me whos gonna hire aoverpaid union vet with 20 years experiance broom pushing sorry bub nobody isgoing to pay you 40 dollars an hour to do somthing that a chimp will do for abanana.
    
    stephen，你说到点子上了，工会是双面刃，而这都归因于贪婪。如果最终没有工会，公司将压榨工人(最低工资、没有福利，参照沃尔玛)。从另一方面说，一个强有力的工会将迫使公司退让，直至公司的盈利能力被妥协掉(参照通用汽车公司新建立的齿轮处理厂)。过去的历史证明了公司的贪婪，最近的历史证明了工会的贪婪。我在齿轮处理厂亲自见证了后一种的贪婪，在那儿，轮扫帚的工资是40美元每小时。这是无法承受的，公司让大家知道了这一点，并发起了一项工会投票：工人们接受降薪(不是降到不宜生活的水准之下，只是从40美元每小时往下调)，公司保留下来，公司将迁往中国。
    
    工会投票一致同意送走他们的工作。由于工会条款是“你不需要做一份比目前工资更低的工作”，最终，工人们下岗了(译注：这句话语法看不懂)。告诉我，谁会雇佣一个有二十年扫地经验的、被过度支付的工会宠儿？抱歉，兄弟，没人会付你40美元一小时去做那些工作，因为黑猩猩去做那些工作只要一串香蕉。
    
    Frosty • 8 hrs agoReportAbuse
    You get what you paid for. Thing is, thepeople of Chinaare essentially slaves to their leaders. Hoping one day they rise.
    
    你得到了你的工资，但问题是，中国人民本质上只是他们领导人的奴隶。希望他们能起义。
    
    MichaelWan • 8 hrs agoReportAbuse
    The efficiency of American workers equalsto that of China.It is simple math: The price of goods produced by American workers is 10x ofthe price of the same products produced by Chinese workers. As a result,American workers have reasons to claim wages 10 times higher than that of aChinese. The problem is consumers don't want to pay 10 times more for Americanproducts. That leads to the jobs being sent to China.
    
    美国工人的效率与中国工人相同。这只是简单的算术：美国工人制造的产品的价格是中国工人制造的同样产品的价格的十倍，因此，美国工人有理由要求比中国工人高十倍的工资。问题是，消费者不想因为美国产品而多掏十倍的钱。这导致了工作机会被送往中国。
    
    MichaelWan • 8 hrs agoReportAbuse
    You can not blame Chinese for your joblost. This is a market choice.
    
    你不能因为你丢了工作而谴责中国，这是市场的选择。
    
    John • 6 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Does anyone really think American workersare more productive because they are smarter and work harder? Just look ChineseAmerican here in the US.you should know at end who will win the race.
    
    有人真的想过美国工人生产率更高是因为他们更聪明并且工作更努力？看看在美国的华裔美国人吧。你应该知道谁最终会赢得比赛。
    
    Scotty • 6 hrs agoReportAbuse
    @Eric, I would love to know where a factoryworker gets $8,500 insalary and benefits. The factories I worked in before I moved to a corporatejob 6 years ago only paid $9-$12 an hour, and that 12 dollar per hour one wasif you were VERY lucky. I still have family in those types of jobs in Georgia, Alabama,Indiana, and Michigan, and none of them makes over 15 anhour, and that is with them being there for over 20 years!
    
    Eric，我很想知道哪个地方的工人每月工资加福利有8500美元。我以前在工厂工作，直到6年前我改去一家公司上班，工厂工资只有9-12美元每小时，如果你能拿到12美元每小时，那你就是很幸运的人。我仍然有家人在佐治亚、亚拉巴马、印第安纳及密歇根等地从事这种类型的工作，他们中没有一个人的工资超过15美元每小时，而他们在那儿已经超过20年了！
    
    CoolHand • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    @Eric, $8500/mo amounts to a totalcompensation of $102,000/year.
    Where is there a factory that pays that kind of money?
    
    Eric，月薪8500美元，等于年薪是10.2万美元。
    哪个地方的工厂付这种级别的工资？
    
    douglas • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Companies are begining to pull back frommanufacturing in China.There have been some news stories on it but not many. I guess the newsies don'tthink it will sell papers (or eyeball time, or whatever). Why would they moveback? Rising labor costs in Chinaand rising transportation costs (fuel costs) as well as public sentiment in theUS in favor of "made inthe USA."
    It's happening. It just takes time to build momentum.
    
    制造业公司正在从中国撤回。有一些相关新闻但是总体上还不多。我猜报业人员认为这个消息不是卖点(或者说不能吸引眼球)。为什么这些公司会转移回来？因为中国上涨的劳动力价格、上涨的运输成本(燃料成本)，以及美国公众喜爱“美国制造”的情感。
    
    这件事正在发生，它只是需要时间去形成趋势。
    
    Kevin • 4 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Well Alex
    I shed a crocodile tear for the businessmen that have to give the value whereit comes from. It seems to me that the truley overcompensated are the owners.
    
    好的，Alex，我为那些不得不把价值还给(价值)来源之地的商人们流一滴鳄鱼泪。在我看来，真正被过度支付的是那些老板。
    
    FreeShijia • 3 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Douglas, higher labor in China by no means mean a return of thosemanufacturing jobs to the US.There is pretty much the rest of the world to go to for companies who sellcheap goods before using expensive US labor.
    The reality is, as long as we live in a society where people buy pens by theboxes, clothing runs out of fashion in 3 months, and the next big thing inelectronics happens twice a year, manufacturing will always be done by cheaplabor.
    And please consider this, the Chinese did not invent or run this world ofdisposable goods - at best they are the middlemen, at worst exploited muscle.Who are the people designing this springs' fashion? Who are the peopledesigning and marketing the latest must have gadget across TV networks, internetand post?
    And on the other end, who are the people who line up at the stores at Easter,Memorial day, labor day, 4th o July, black friday, boxing day (oh I mean week)sales? These are the real players and drivers.
    
    Douglas，中国劳动力价格上涨绝不意味着那些制造业工作回到美国。在使用美国劳动力之前，那些公司仍然有很多出售廉价商品的国家可去。
    事实是，只要我们还生活在这样一个社会：人们整盒整盒的购买钢笔、衣服3个月就过时了、两年就搞一次大选，制造业工作将一直由廉价劳动力来做。
    而且，请考虑这一点，中国人并没有发明或利用一次性用品来运转这个世界，往好了说，他们是中间商；往坏了说，他们不过是卖苦力的。是哪些人在设计今春的时装？是哪些人设计并通过电视网、互联网及邮政来推广最新的小玩意？
    从另一方面来说，是哪些人在复活节、纪念日、劳动节、独立日、黑色星期五、节礼日排队购物？
    这些人才是真正的玩家和驱动者。
    
    nocrap • 2 hrs 28 mins agoReportAbuse
    americans are generally way overpaid,that's why U.S.keeps printing money,
    
    总体上，美国人被过度支付了，这就是美国持续印钞票的原因。
    
    MichaelWan • 2 hrs 10 mins agoReportAbuse
    @frosty, If I say you are slave of yourwife, your family, your teacher and your government, who would argue with me?You don't know anything about China,please don't play smart, that make you look stupid.
    
    Frosty，如果我说你是你老婆、你家人、你的老师以及你的政府的奴隶，谁会与我争论吗？你对中国一无所知，请不要耍小聪明，那让你看上去很蠢。
    
    Stephen • 1 hr 57mins agoReportAbuse
    it is our govt, and their bad rules andunions why are jobs went overseas. right now we have few jobs for the americanpeople and our dirty rotten govt. is trying to bring in more immigrants. tarand feather every single politican and start out new again
    
    因为政府及其糟糕的政策以及工会，让工作去了海外。现在，我们美国人的工作机会很少，而我们肮脏腐烂的政府试图引入更多的移民。(让我们)严厉惩罚每个政客，然后重新出发。
    
    nocrap • 1 hr 56 mins agoReportAbuse
    it is Chinese people's motivation to makethem go to work, not because Chinese government tell them to.
    
    是中国人民的积极性使得他们去工作，而不是中国政府告诉他们去工作。
    
    ErnestCruzen • 7 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Of course china will do this. They don'twant the irk of foreign countries. But secretly, they want more.
    
    当然中国会这么做(译注：指否认第一名)。他们不想激怒外国，但是私下里，他们想要的更多。
    
    sahaja • 7 hrs agoReportAbuse
    You don't say.... Good thinking Ernest!
    
    你等于什么都没说，好好思考吧！
    
    BledDry • 6 hrs agoReportAbuse
    What about fair trade instead of freetrade? Why aren't the politicians working on something that would truly make adifference in American lives?
    
    为什么说是公平贸易而不是说自由贸易？为什么政客们就不能做一些真正能改变美国人生活的事？
    
    Controversial/ Accountab ... • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Traitor
    
    叛徒。
    
    Xxx • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Let the USAkeep attracting harted all over the world, while China keep making money.
    
    让美国继续满世界拉仇恨，而同时中国继续挣钱。
    
    AMERICAN1975 • 15 hrs agoReportAbuse
    "Free" trade is destroying thiscountry, -$788 BILLION trade deficit!!! We have a-$315 BILLION trade deficitwith Chinaalone! Wonder WHY your property taxes are higher, you don't get raises, theoverall quality of life is lower- "FREE" TRADE!!!!
    
    自由贸易正在摧毁这个国家。7880亿美元的贸易逆差！！！单单与中国的贸易逆差就达到3150亿美元！想想为什么你的物业税更高了、你没有得到加薪、总体生活质量下降了？都是因为“自由贸易”！！！
    
    Lucas • 14 hrs agoReportAbuse
    consumer mindset!
    disposable mindset!
    That is why we have a huge trade deficit.
    Chinais developing a massive appetite for our products. Our biggest companies onlyhave growth in countries like Chinaand India,with over a billion potential customers each!
    
    消费者心态！一次性用品心态！
    这是我们拥有巨额逆差的原因。
    对于我们的产品，中国正在发展出巨大的胃口。我们的大公司只有在中国和印度这样的国家才获得增长，这两个国家有超过十亿的潜在消费者。
    
    AMERICAN1975 • 13 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Lucas 2 billion POOR people are notAmerican style consumers. If sheer numbers mattered, Africawould be rich.
    
    楼上，二十亿贫穷的人民不是美国式的消费者。如果仅仅考虑人口数量，非洲人就富了。
    
    River • 12 hrs agoReportAbuse
    China doesn't want the title - she just wantsthe money.
    
    中国不想要名号，她只想要钱。
    
    David • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Hard to believe we're even close; difficultto find any products not made in China.
    
    很难相信我们两国的贸易值相近：很难发现什么产品不是中国生产的。
    
    TXLib • 5 hrs ago ReportAbuse
    The continuing demand by the Americaconsumer for cheap goods regardless of the use of slavery is what drives thesenumbers.
    
    美国消费者不顾(中国)使用奴隶制而持续需求廉价商品，这驱动了上述(贸易)数字的产生。
    
    A Yahoo! User • 4 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Yeah because Americais the only country that is stuff importing from China. Get real. China sends stuff everywhere oneway or another.
    
    是啊，因为美国是唯一从中国进口商品的国家。现实点吧。
    中国以各种方式向各国出口商品。
    
    TXLib • 2 hrs 55 mins agoReportAbuse
    The trading infrastructure was developed tosupport the American demand.
    
    贸易基础设施得到了发展，以支撑美国人的需求。
    
    John • 2 hrs 1 minagoReportAbuse
    When they are WILLING to work at low wagesit stops to be slavery.
    
    当他们自愿从事低薪工作时，那就不再是奴隶制了。
    
    Richard • 6 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Translation= China Wants Ta Keep The Huge TradeImbalance Laws In Place It Now Enjoys
    
    (中国商务部声明的)翻译：中国希望继续享受目前的、造成巨大贸易不均衡的条款。
    
    DragonDawn • 2 hrs 58 mins agoReportAbuse
    Confucius says "Be modest and let thyenemies be complacent." I guess all those West Pointgraduates on Sun Tzu did not pass that course. No wonder the West keep losingwars after wars. PearlHarbor anyone?
    
    孔夫子说“保持谦虚谨慎，让敌人骄傲自满吧”。我猜西点军校的毕业生都没通过孙子兵法这门课程。难怪西方一场接一场的输掉战争。珍珠港？
    
    BillM • 7 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Well it sure isn't the USA
    
    好吧，肯定不是美国。
    
    DISGUSTED • 7 hrs agoReportAbuse
    CHINA is the BIGGEST most powerful country inthe world today......thanks to that idiot obummer
    
    今天中国是世界上最强力的国家，感谢蠢货奥巴马。
    
    Terrible • 7 hrs agoReportAbuse
    "Of course, it is only a matter oftime before Chinabecomes No. 1," said Ren
    
    Ren说“当然，中国成为世界第一，只是时间问题”。
    
    Mark • 8 hrs agoReportAbuse
    If they still want to be ranked lower justreport the numbers on a per capita basis. The size of their population meansthey should be ahead of the Americans in total value, but the US should blow them away on percapita basis.
    
    如果他们仍然想排名靠后，那只要按人均计算数字就行了。由于他们的人口规模，他们应该在总量上领先美国，但是美国在人均上甩他们几条街。
    
    fortziii • 10 hrs agoReportAbuse
    you can thank those greedy idiots whostarted that "globalization" thingy...
    
    你可以想象那些开始“全球化”的傻瓜有多么贪婪。
    
    Timur • 15 hrs agoReportAbuse
    What, you guys think China should boast her success?
    
    什么？你们这些家伙以为中国会自夸其成功？
    
    Lucas • 14 hrs agoReportAbuse
    buy, china, buy!
    
    购买，中国购买！
    
    florence • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Funny how the USAgovernment made Chinathe new Trading Super Power of the World. Thanks from the 47% under employedAmericans .
    
    很有趣，美国政府是怎么使得中国成为新的世界贸易超级大国的？47%失业的美国人民发来贺电。
    
    YutPhut E-Gair Bah • 11 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Worlds biggest American corporation trashmaking non-tariff trader
    
    世界最大的美国垃圾公司开展无关税贸易。
    
    DragonDawn • 9 hrs agoReportAbuse
    "Beijingwants to be a global leader but insists it still is a poor country."
    Don't worry, Chinais a friend otherwise than won't have lend so much Yuan for US Food Stampprinting press to work 24/7 for at least a decade now. go to Walmart, acompliment of things Chinese. Chinese are poor, their students in the UScan't afford public transportation so their parents just buy them some cheapbrand new BMW, Lexus, Mercedez. No one want to rent to them, so they buy houseswith cash since their credit rating is too low. relax, the Chinese will takecenturies to get out of poverty, just keep going to Walmart.
    
    “北京希望成为一个全球领导者，但仍坚持她是一个贫困的国家”。
    别担心，中国是朋友，否则也不会借那么多钱给美国了。现在，(美国)印刷食品卷的企业需要一周七天每天24小时连轴转干活了。去沃尔玛吧，那是对中国货的赞美。中国人很穷，他们在美的留学生坐不起公交车，所以学生父母就给他们买一些廉价车，诸如宝马、雷克萨斯、奔驰等等。没人愿意租房子给他们，所以他们用现金购买住房，因为他们的存款利率太低了。放松，继续去沃尔玛吧，中国需要几个世纪才能走出贫困。
    
    Robert • 7 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Dragon you are a traitor too, go to China
    
    楼上，你也是个叛徒，去中国吧。
    
    DragonDawn • 6 hrs agoReportAbuse
    @Robert, i'm already in China andwesterners are banging at the doors of the Great Wall to get in for the Sanctiontoo.
    
    楼上，我已经在中国了，西方人在长城的入口挤做一团，争着来接受制裁。
    
    wow • 14 hrs agoReportAbuse
    They need to grow five times more to becomparable to ours!
    
    他们需要再成长五倍，才能与我们相比！
    
    DragonDawn • 3 hrs agoReportAbuse
    n they will !
    
    嗯，他们会的。
    
    Ray • 14 hrs agoReportAbuse
    The MOST poluted city in the world is Beijing. And the reasonis that smog emissions are left OFF the autos so people can afford them!
    
    世界上污染最严重的城市是北京，污染的原因是汽车的尾气排放，所以中国人是买得起汽车的！
    
    Justa thought • 15 hrs agoReportAbuse
    simply put,the world is a market,Chinaloves Capitalism, get over it
    
    简单说，世界就是一个市场，而中国热爱资本主义，克服它吧。
    
    OrangePeanut • 6 hrs agoReportAbuse
    When will we get a president with a set ofball's to limit Chinese import's and FINALLY put OUR people first? It's notfree trade when they pay their people $1 a day and undermine FREEDOM with slavery.
    
    什么时候我们才能有一位总统来设定一系列条款以控制从中国的进口，并最终将美国人民置于首位？当他们付给他们的人民每天一美元工资并且用奴隶制来破坏自由的时候，这就不是自由贸易。
    
    TXLib • 6 hrs agoReportAbuse
    So you want tariffs?
    
    这么说，你希望有关税？
    
    OrangePeanut • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    No, I want a ban on item's we can andshould be producing here but get undersold by slave labor. Is it so hard tofigure that out?
    
    否，我希望禁止进口那些我们可以并且应该在本土生产的产品，而不是进口奴隶劳动力生产的低价倾销的产品。把这些产品列出来很难吗？
    
    JeffersonDavis • 10 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Every country in the world spy on eachother. Heck we spy on England.They know it so they use us as a training exercise.
    
    世界上的每个国家都对别国开展间谍活动。我们刺探英国的情报，他们知道这一点，所以就把我们的(间谍活动)当做培训课程。
    
    JeffersonDavis • 10 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Troop your tax dollars and all American taxpayers have helped make Chinathe largest trader in the world. America is the richest nation inthe world. If the survey was by the nation who owned the company we wound winhands down.
    
    把你们的税款聚在一起，所有的美国纳税人都帮助了中国成为世界最大贸易国。美国是世界上最富有的国家。如果调查哪个国家拥有这些公司，那么美国将轻松获胜。
    
    Christopher • 11 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Manufacturers are mostly American companiesor american companies who have contract with the the chinese. China is notthe true economy as we see it, it's the foreigners as Americans who owns andruns it, like Apple, Nike, Walmart, Fredrix and so many others. They go thereor other poor countries for cheap labors and this is the reason why China willremain poor for many years to come. By 20 years the chinese old age populationwill take over the young population, then there will be far fewer workers sincethey will need young workers to take care of them.
    
    制造商大部分是美国公司，或者是与中国有合同的美国公司。中国不是我们看上去的那种经济体，是诸如美国人这样的外国人拥有并运营着公司，比如苹果、耐克、沃尔玛、Fredrix等等。这些公司去中国或者其它贫困国家以使用当地的廉价劳动力，这就是中国将继续贫困很多年的原因。再过20年，中国老年人口将超过青年人口，那时他们就没有多少新工人了，而他们需要新工人照顾老年人。
    
    Quest • 9 hrs agoReportAbuse
    LOL you are really stupid! LOL
    
    可笑，你真是个蠢货！
    
    Christopher • 8 hrs agoReportAbuse
    To Quest, you ARE stupid. I live in Asia and see them working here everyday.
    
    楼上，你才是个蠢货。我住在亚洲，看到他们天天工作。
    
    Rodney • 8 hrs agoReportAbuse
    @ Quest you should make a quest of findingout what you are talking about Chris is right
    
    楼上上，你该想想你们在谈论什么话题？楼上是对的。
    
    ID2 • 8 hrs agoReportAbuse
    FDI and foreign run companies only countsfor 30% of China'stotal GDP, the majority of if are infrastructure buildings by the governmentsand their SOEs. So get off your stupid high horse and start seeing the real China, insteadof your propaganda hating diatribes. America can't even make a pennywithout bankrupting themselves.
    
    外商直接投资以及外商运营公司的产值只占中国GDP的30%，占GDP大部分的是政府开展的基础设施建设以及国有公司。所以，丢掉你那愚蠢的盛气凌人态度，开始看看真实的中国吧，而不是宣传对中国的仇恨诽谤。除非把自己弄破产，否则美国人一分钱都拿不出来。
    
    jobe • 13 hrs agoReportAbuse
    "China rejects status as world'sbiggest trader."
    ........
    Next up, Chinarejects status as largest Chinese population.
    
    “中国拒绝世界最大贸易国的地位”
    ........
    下一步，中国拒绝拥有最多华人人口的地位。
    
    Ludahai • 12 hrs agoReportAbuse
    well, they will actually lose that title inthe near future to Indiaanyway
    
    是的，不久的将来，印度将夺走最多人口的头衔。
    
    jobe • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    ..and Indiawill lose there's to England.
    
    而印度将把最大人口的桂冠输给英国。
    
    Zorgs • 15 hrs agoReportAbuse
    it's about population 350 million vs 1.3billion people. china's government working together to be the greatest. notlike American trying to bring each other down.
    
    两国人口是3.5亿对13亿。中国政府团结努力以成为最伟大国家，而不像美国人试图相互拆台。
    
    Blackneck • 7 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Got Mandarin??
    
    学中文？
    
    Sus素素 • 5 hrs agoReportAbuse
    Yup, China is the world biggest TRAITOR!!!
    
    是的，中国是这世上最大的叛徒！！！
    
    John • 1 hr 33mins agoReportAbuse
    You are not Chinese like your name suggestare you ? B/c if you are then TRAITOR will suit you more.
    
    你不是像你的ID所显示的那样是一个中国人，如果你真的是中国人，那显然叛徒的称号更适合你。
    

网友评论(2292739)2013-02-21 15:45

    好多，求总结
    ----sent from my Sony Ericsson LT28h,Android 4.0.4
    

网友评论(13413981)2013-02-21 15:58

    Reply to Reply Post by 似真似幻 (2013-02-21 15:45)
    
    中国坚持发展中国家100年，动摇不得！
    

网友评论(753551)2013-02-21 16:05

    回去慢慢看
    

网友评论(265711)2013-02-21 16:05

    那个说再过20年中国新产出劳动力会变少的其实很有道理
    中国可能会相应调整人口政策
    

网友评论(5641289)2013-02-21 16:06

    Topic Post by 珐姆·凡·凡 (2013-02-21 15:35):
    
    制造商大部分是美国公司，或者是与中国有合同的美国公司。中国不是我们看上去的那种经济体，是诸如美国人这样的外国人拥有并运营着公司，比如苹果、耐克、沃尔玛、Fredrix等等。这些公司去中国或者其它贫困国家以使用当地的廉价劳动力，这就是中国将继续贫困很多年的原因。再过20年，中国老年人口将超过青年人口，那时他们就没有多少新工人了，而他们需要新工人照顾老年人。
    这个说的有道理啊
    

网友评论(2234246)2013-02-21 16:06

    好多精神中国人
    

网友评论(1213430)2013-02-21 16:12

    it's about population 350 million vs 1.3billion people. china's government working together to be the greatest. notlike American trying to bring each other down.
    
    两国人口是3.5亿对13亿。中国政府团结努力以成为最伟大国家，而不像美国人试图相互拆台。